« Home | I'm an addict » | It's all right to shake, to fight, to feel » | Winter arrives for ever and ever » | "Though some see Canada as cold and remote" » | Sexy time explosion » | Television rots your brain » | When it's hot I'd like to die » | Secret histories » | "the psychology of the players" » | Empathising and systemising » 

Friday, June 23, 2006 

Criticism is a reaction as well as an explanation

Absolutely fantastic post by John Scalzi on why there is no Lester Bangs or Pauline Kael of video games - yet. Any of my music criticism writing brethren owe it to themselves to check this out, particularly points 3 (the difference between review and criticism) and 6 (why certain art forms/genres get good criticism; the essentially defensive nature of a lot of it; the origin of rockism) - it's not just the fact that he uses music criticism as an example that makes it relevant. I'm on my way out of the door, but I'll expand on this later.

2 comments

Pauline Kael...she hated Kubrick. That automatically relegates her to the dust heap for me. I never liked her columns anyway.

I think Klostermann (and Scalzi) are more using her of an example of type rather than quality, although they certainly both like her more than you do.

Post a Comment


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 2.5 Canada License.

About me

Ian Mathers is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in Stylus, the Village Voice, Resident Advisor, PopMatters, and elsewhere. He does stuff and it magically appears here.

Contact Me:
imathers at gmail dot com

My profile
Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates