« Home | Witness the piece that made TMFTML so mad they mis... » | I'll admit to a minor tinge of anger when this art... » | An idea whose time has come: Modern Drunkard Maga... » | I've been a little worried as to what Think Tank w... » | Now from Something Awful: Road signs as seen by i... » | Know why I love Josh Homme of Queens of the Stone ... » | "It's the sonic equivalent of going up to someone ... » | Sign of the times? » | Great article by Carlin on, well, the KLF and Meta... » | Pynchon on Orwell. How cool is that? Excellent a... » 

Tuesday, May 06, 2003 

This article has its good and bad points, but the third "criminological fallacy" listed is fallacious in itself. Is it true that it's not helping to assert that someone is not guilty of a crime they actually committed because of their race? Certainly. Does rehabilitation inextricably involve accepting that you've made bad decisions in the past? Again, true. But does any of this disprove or indeed have anything to do with the statement "The criminal justice system is biased against blacks"? It does not. It's a very difficult question to ask to what extent, and in what ways, the system may be biased racially - but we should not take it as a given that it is, incontrovertiably, nor should we glibly reject it based on the arguements in this article. And, of course, even if the system is biased (which I think it is), there are still going to be non-Caucasians in jail who are actually guilty.



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 2.5 Canada License.

About me

Ian Mathers is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in Stylus, the Village Voice, Resident Advisor, PopMatters, and elsewhere. He does stuff and it magically appears here.

Contact Me:
imathers at gmail dot com

My profile
Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates