« Home | D'oh » | Instant nostalgia - just add water » | Tripwire » | White whale » | Representing » | Dissent is never simple » | "How will I know?" » | Scary stuff » | EP fever » | Wednesday's Emotional Setup: Cody » 

Monday, May 03, 2004 

Category error

This article, while making a few good points, seems to me to have gotten fascism all wrong. To say something like "Conservatives believe in God, tradition, the monarchy, civilisation and the individual, whereas fascists are pagan, primitivist, collectivist state-worshippers who prefer jackboots to crowns" is to make a deep error in categorization, especially when the author of the review goes on to say "Paxton wisely renounces the attempt to isolate an 'essence' of fascism". As mentioned here before, Umberto Eco has pretty much the best set of working definitions for this particular ideological disease.



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 2.5 Canada License.

About me

Ian Mathers is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in Stylus, the Village Voice, Resident Advisor, PopMatters, and elsewhere. He does stuff and it magically appears here.

Contact Me:
imathers at gmail dot com

My profile
Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates