« Home | Yay! Evangelical RPGs for everyone! » | Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!!! » | I can't seem to link the individual post, but go t... » | Interesting article on France and the US, although... » | The American school system scares the shit out of me. » | The Andrew WK concert, by the way, was amazing. G... » | The best nickname I've ever heard of for female ge... » | I'm glad Shane is updating more often, but inquiri... » | Ted Koppel fucking rocks. » | New journal entry, at long last, in the usual place. » 

Tuesday, September 09, 2003 

Historicity vs. revisionism in classical music. Only it's a funny, well-written article. Go figure. [Edit: The fact I think it's well-written, however, doesn't mean I agree with it 100% - I think the problem isn't that classical music is trying to emulate rock, but rather pop music. That's not a knock against pop, nor am I trying to say that pop is part of "increasing disconnect between music and meaning" (I don't think that's happening at all, actually). But I think even the most rabid pop music would agree that classical should no more be trying to be something it's not than pop should, and that seems to be what the trends Swafford bemoans are about.]



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 2.5 Canada License.

About me

Ian Mathers is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in Stylus, the Village Voice, Resident Advisor, PopMatters, and elsewhere. He does stuff and it magically appears here.

Contact Me:
imathers at gmail dot com

My profile
Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates